Rule of Law in Bangladesh and UK
Rule of Law:
"No free man shall be taken or imprison or desseised or exiled or in any way destroyed nor will we go or send forhim, except under a lawful judgement of his peers and by the law of the land". ….MAGNA CARTA
“Often
we mistake stability, in terms of security and economic activity, to mean a
country is doing well. We forget the third and important pillar: rule of law
and respect for human rights.” …Kofi Annan Former General Secretary of UNO
Rule
of Law is one of the basic principles of the English constitution. This
doctrine is accepted in the constitution of U.S.A. and Bangladesh. Now a day,
rule of law is one of the most discussed subjects of developing countries. Developed
countries and donor agencies always instruct the developing countries for sustainable
development and good governance. Actually sustainable development and good
governance mostly depends on the proper application of rule of law. Rule of law
is the mechanism, process, practice, or norm in which all citizens before the
law is required to maintain, and more generally it prevents the arbitrary use
of power. It is a situation where the laws of a country are to be obeyed by
everyone. In fact, everybody is bound to obey law.
Origin of the Concept:
“The
term “rule of law” is used as opposed to the rule of man or king. The term 'Rule of Law' is derived from the French phrase 'La Principe de Legality' (the principle
of legality) which refers to a government
based on principles of law and not of men. In this sense the concept of 'La Principe de Legality' was opposed to arbitrary powers”
- (Mollah, Rule of Law in
Bangladesh: An Overview)
This
concept of “Rule of Law” is very ancient, as it is explained in Aristotle‟s
politics book chapter iii in England. The Idea that ‘the King is also subject
to Laws of the Land’ has its origin in the Magna Carta of 1215 by King John.
In
the 13th century Bracton, a judge at the time of Henry III in a way introduced
in a way because the concept of rule of law is reflected in his following
words:
“The
King himself ought to be subject to God and the Law, because Law makes him
King”
In
the 17th century, Edward Coke is said to be the initiator of concept of Rule of
Law when he said that:
“The
king must be under God and Law and thus vindicated the supremacy of Law over
the pretensions of the executives.”
Professor
A.V Dicey He was a British Jurist and Constitutional Theorist is said to be the
initiator of the modern concept of Rule of Law because he developed the concept
remarkably by his numbers of write-ups in this regard.
Dicey’s Concepts of Rule of Law:
Dicey
in his classic book, “The law and the constitution” published in the year 1885, developed this theory. According to him there are three meanings to the
said doctrine;
1.
Absence of Arbitrary Power or Supremacy of law
2.
Equality before law
3.
Protection of citizens rights
Absence of Arbitrary Power or
Supremacy of Law:
Dicey
shapes that rule of law means the absolute supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to the influence of arbitrary power or wide discretionary
power. Where no one has the right to
abuse or misuse of power. Similarly,
no one can be punished or made to suffer except for a breach of law proved by
an ordinary court. For Example: article
33 of our constitution describes the right
of citizens in arrest and detention.
Equality
before Law:
Dicey
says that there must be equality before the law or the equal treatment
of all classes to the ordinary law of the land administered by the
ordinary courts of law. In addition to that he says, in a state where rule of
law is prevalent, no one is above the law and everyone is equal before
the law regardless of social, economic, or political status. For
Example: Article 27 of our constitution guarantees that all citizens are
equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law.
Protection
of citizen’s rights:
The
third concept of rule of law is that the constitution or law of the state should
ensure the protection of right of the citizens of a particular state.
For example, article 44 of the Constitution of Bangladesh provides
that in case of violation of any of the fundamental rights enlisted in
part III may go to the HCD and file a writ petition under article 102 to
enforce the right.
Constitutional
Provisions Regarding Rule of Law in Bangladesh:
·
The preamble to the constitution of
Bangladesh that:
"It
shall be fundamental aim of the state to realize through the democratic process
a socialist society, free from exploitation - a society in which the rule of
law, fundamental human rights and freedom, equality and justice, political
economic and social, will be secured for all Citizens”
·
As regards „equality before law‟,
Article 27 of the Constitution declares that:
“All
citizens are equal before the law irrespective of their status and position and
any person however high and mighty is amenable to the provisions of law.”
Modern
Concept of Rule of Law:
This
concept was developed by the International Commission of Jurists. Known as
Delhi Declaration, 1959. According to this formulation-
“The
rule of law implies that the functions of the government in a free society
should be so exercised as to create conditions in which the dignity of man as
an individual is upheld. This dignity requires not only the recognition of
certain civil or political rights but also creation of certain political,
social, economic, educational and cultural conditions which are essential to
the full development of his personality”.
Sir
Ivor Jennings says –
“In
proper sense rule of law implies a democratic system, a constitutional
government where criticism of the government is not only permissible but also a
positive merit and where parties based on competing politics or interests are
not only allowed but encouraged. Where this exists the other consequences of
rule of law must follow”.
Unlike
Dicey, Lord Bingham defined 8 sub-rules of Rule of Law:
•
Law should be accessible, clear and predictable;
•
Questions of legal right and liability should be decided by application of the
law;
•
The law of the land should apply equally to all, except when objective
difference
requires differentiation;
•
Public officials should exercise their powers in good faith, and not exceed
their powers;
•
The law must protect fundamental rights;
•
A method should be provided, at reasonable cost, to resolve civil disputes;
•
Adjudicative procedures must be provided by the state should be fair;
•
The rule of law requires the state to comply with its obligations in international
law.
Rule
of Law in the UK:
Absence
of Arbitrary power/ Due Process of Law:
A
notable case, Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030, purported
to establish the rule of law in the UK. This case held that a police officer,
before entering into the house or private property of any person, must show the
lawful authority to do so. Although, in Riversidge
vs. Anderson (1942) the use of some arbitrary administrative power was granted
to the police during wartime reflects some, the Police and Criminal Evidence
Act 1984 redefined the powers of police.
Equality
before Law:
Now in the UK, equality before law is required
in every sphere of public life. Although
the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 has reduced the legal immunities and privileges
of the Crown in its public capacity, there are still many situations where the
Crown, to some extent other public bodies enjoy a privileged position in
litigation but law regulates all these exceptions. Even now, the immunities of
the monarch subsist at common law only if the courts permit them.
Protection
of Citizens’ Right:
In
Malone vs Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1979) the court refused to
recognize any right to privacy at common law that would render telephone-
tapping unlawful because no law contained the same as a citizens’ right then.
However, the Human Rights Act 1998 ensures number of fundamental
rights in the UK.